Rape Is Not A Method Of Conception…or Vaginas and Penises and Ignorance Oh My pt.2

What is in the water in Indiana and Missouri these days?

The train wreck that is Todd Akin continues to roll; the latest for those of you not in Missouri is about Todd and friends referring to Claire McCaskill as a dog. Here in Missouri, there are even more stories which y’all might eventually hear about.

But in Indiana…my word. Now I did hear things like “God doesn’t give things that you can’t handle” while growing up [that is a part of evangelical and fundamentalist culture], but really.

Richard Mourdock, Senate candidate in Indiana said the following last night:

“I struggled with it myself for a long time, but I came to realize life is that gift from God. I think that even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen.”

I do understand the saying “when life gives you lemons, make lemonade”, I do not understand how (or when) rape became a “lemon.” Rape is a bodily violation. Rape is a psychic violation. Rape is a spiritual violation. Rape is NOT something G-d intended to happen. Rape is not a “lemon.”

I’ve talked about Dominionists and dominionist theology before. And I’ve talked about the need for religious liberals to counter theology with theology. You cannot wait for a generational shift to happen; that won’t bring you as far as you think. Religious liberals must get into the theological marketplace and start to speak against the dominionist theology that will eventually be in every textbook that schoolchildren receive. Religious liberals must get into the theological marketplace on the internet and counter the theologies that drive us toward death and destruction and injustice (thanatos) with theologies that move us toward life and beauty and justice (eros).

Religious liberals ignore this time in history at our peril. It’s time to get to work.

~ by Kim on October 24, 2012.

3 Responses to “Rape Is Not A Method Of Conception…or Vaginas and Penises and Ignorance Oh My pt.2”

  1. So, does Mourdock believe that if some guy rapes a woman, it’s ok, because that’s what God meant to happen? Right, and then She meant that the guy would go to jail, and the woman would abort the pregnancy, and we’d pass laws that helped the plan.

  2. “And I’ve talked about the need for religious liberals to counter theology with theology.”

    Problem is. . . that Unitarian Universalists, to say nother of other religious liberals, don’t really have all that much in the way of bona fide God based *Theo*logy these days, do they?

  3. The sway of Hegel was broken by Ritschl, who emphasized the importance of faith and religious experience. He upheld Christianity’s claim to uniqueness but argued that Christian experience should be based on the objective data of history, not personal feeling. He saw Christianity as a life of action which would free man from the enslaving passions of his own nature and the determinism of his physical enviroment. Religious statements are value judgments relating to one’s spiritual situation and have practical consequences. His theology of moral values relates the gospel to two poles, the redemptive work of Christ and the fellowship of redeemed persons (the kingdom of God). In the kingdom one achieves moral perfection and thus is like Christ. God is immanent, transcendent, and personal all at the same time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: